You Might Not Need Gatsby
May 17, 2020
First of all, disclaimer: I love Gatbsy. This framework has entirely changed the way I think about both Static Site Generators(SSG) and React. It has sent shockwaves through the frontend community, and showed us the true potential of the so-called “JAMstack”. This website is even built with Gatsby!
Okay, done with disclaimer, time to complain. Let’s check out some serious issues with Gatsby, the new popular kid in React, Frontend, and SSG worlds.
What could possibly be wrong with Gatsby?
In short bullet point format:
- Why do I have to write a GraphQL query to render an image?
- Loss of some SPA/History API features, such as embedded routes. Gatsby is closer in design to traditional SSG, and kind of locked to 1 component <-> 1 URL route.
- Sharp dependency is huge and always breaks
- Opinionated plugin ecosystem — unnecessary wrapper/obfuscation of existing APIs. For example, I can’t just use
styled-components, I have to use
- Architecture, code splitting, etc. for the most part have to be done “the Gatsby way”.
Note: As a reminder, the goal in using a SSG like Gatsby is to create fast, static, SEO-friendly pages. That’s a gross oversimplification, yes. But basically: we want to send meaningful HTML content over the line when users visit our site, rather than just sending the
If not Gatsby…then how?
So — are the above headaches a price worth paying for creating static pages with React?
For small projects, Gatsby is probably not worth the headaches. Can’t I just write Plain Old React without having to conform to “the Gatsby way”? And get a static site out of it? How?
The answer is prerendering.
Once again, I went down the prerendering rabbit hole, my old nemesis. I think of prerendering as a life hack — turn your client rendered app into a static site, for free. Again, gross oversimplification.
This time, I came back from the rabbit hole with react-snap. In my experience, this library works a lot better than the popular prerender-spa-plugin. It also doesn’t rely on Webpack, and supports inline critical css!
Do you really need
gatsby-plugin-offline to make your site work offline? Instead of learning it “the Gatsby way”, you can instead spend that cognitive investment on the vanilla Service Worker API, and get something more configurable. You also get universally applicable knowledge this way, not Gatsby specific knowledge.
The configuration and usage is equally complex as setting up offline support for Gatsby, in my experience. Check the MDN Docs on Service Worker API.
Show me code
If you want to try this vanilla-static-react setup, you can try my scaffolding tool directly.
$ npx sssrpbp --name=some-project
Also, this all works for Preact just the same.
$ npx sssrpbp --name=some-micro-project --template=preact
This will create a react app set up to use react-snap and parcel, with my personal picks for prettier and eslint setup. It’s probably more of a personal preference tool here, not a “framework”. Regardless, the key ingredients are there and could be a starting point.
Some more code links where I’m using this alternative to Gatsby:
sssrpbp— the above mentioned scaffolding tool/boilerplate.
- pprmnt — an app built using this setup, including offline support.
- damachabeats — another app using this setup.
These are just my personal ramblings on the topic of static React, and I found what I like the best and what I’m most productive with. There’s also react-static, which takes a similar (but slightly stripped down) approach as Gatsby.
No other comments on this topic.
Key visual: a photo I took the other night on my bike. Not related to React, at all.
Personal blog by John Roberts